Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 890
Filtrar
1.
Eur Urol Focus ; 9(6): 863-865, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940391

RESUMO

We highlight the need for multidisciplinary teamwork, education, practical sustainability actions, informed choices for devices, and research in urologic care to reduce its environmental impact while maintaining quality health care for patients.


Assuntos
Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Urologia , Humanos , Urologia/normas
2.
Urology ; 164: 40-45, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34973242

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To systematically analyze the wording of American Urological Association (AUA) clinical practice guidelines' recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically identified all AUA guideline documents that used the current AUA framework and extracted the individual recommendations, their statement type, and their corresponding evidence level (if applicable), and analyzed the recommendation wording separating out the modal verbs (eg, should, may, or must) as well as the main verbs (eg, recommend, treat, perform). We performed descriptive statistics using SPSS Version 27. RESULTS: We included 18 documents with 754 distinct recommendations; the median number of recommendations per guideline was 36 (interquartile range: 29; 48.5). Expert opinion was the most used statement type (193; 25.6%), followed by clinical principle (156; 20.7%). Four-hundred-four recommendations were either strong, moderate, or conditional: 135 (17.9%), 187 (24.8%) and 83 (11.0%), respectively. Most recommendation statements (701; 93.0%) used modal verbs to express a level of obligation. Overall, "should" was the most employed modal verb used (73.9%), followed by "may" (17.6%) and "must" (1.5%). Both "may" and "should" were used in conjunction with all five statement types, whereas "must" was limited to strong recommendations and clinical principles. CONCLUSION: The wording of AUA recommendation statements does not signal the strength of recommendation and the intended level of obligation, which may represent a barrier to guideline implementation. More consistent wording of recommendations by strength may improve guideline understanding, uptake, and adherence.


Assuntos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Urologia/normas , Humanos , Estados Unidos
6.
J Urol ; 207(2): 314-323, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34547923

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Prior research has shown that concordance with the guideline-endorsed recommendation to re-resect patients diagnosed with primary T1 bladder cancer (BC) is suboptimal. Therefore, the aim of this population-based study was to identify factors associated with re-resection in T1 BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We linked province-wide BC pathology reports (January 2001 to December 2015) with health administrative data sources to derive an incident cohort of patients diagnosed with T1 BC in the province of Ontario, Canada. Re-resection was ascertained by a billing claim for transurethral resection within 2 to 8 weeks after the initial resection, accounting for system-related wait times. Multivariable logistic regression analysis accounting for the clustered nature of the data was used to identify various patient-level and surgeon-level factors associated with re-resection. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant (2-sided). RESULTS: We identified 7,373 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, 1,678 patients (23%) underwent re-resection. Patients with a more aggressive tumor profile and individuals without sufficiently sampled muscularis propria as well as younger, healthier and socioeconomically advantaged patients were more likely to receive re-resection (all p <0.05). In addition, more senior, lower volume and male surgeons were less likely to perform re-resection for their patients (all p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of all patients received re-resection within 2 to 8 weeks after initial resection. To improve the access to care for potentially underserved patients, we suggest specific knowledge translation/exchange interventions that also include equity aspects besides further promotion of evidence-based instead of eminence-based medicine.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Cistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Cistectomia/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Oncologia/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Ontário/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Reoperação/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Urologia/normas
7.
J Urol ; 207(2): 293-301, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34551594

RESUMO

PURPOSE: National and international guidelines recommend the use of 1 dose of intravesical chemotherapy immediately following surgery for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, which is performed infrequently on a population level. We sought to understand the importance of potential environmental and clinical dimensions involved in the decision to offer this therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urologists from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) rated 8 distinct clinical vignettes involving patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. A ratings-based conjoint analysis method was used to evaluate the clinical vignette responses. Each vignette included 4 clinical dimensions and 2 environmental dimensions, with each dimension consisting of 2 possible attributes. The relative importance of each attribute was derived from the regression model and ranked in order. RESULTS: A total of 58 urologists answered the clinical vignettes which represents >75% of MUSIC sites. The median age of urologists was 53, most were male, and median years in practice was 20 years post residency. An environmental attribute, having a recovery room protocol for instilling and disposing of the chemotherapy, ranked as the most influential attribute for giving postoperative chemotherapy (utility=8.6). The clinical attribute yielding the strongest preference for giving chemotherapy was tumor grade (utility=4.9). These preferences varied by different subgroups of urologists, particularly regarding the type of practice a urologist was in. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that urologists have clear preferences for when they offer postoperative immediate chemotherapy. Factors beyond just clinical variables play a role in this decision making process such as the structure of the recovery room.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia Adjuvante/normas , Cistectomia , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Urologia/normas , Administração Intravesical , Adulto , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Urologistas/normas , Urologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologia/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
Obstet Gynecol ; 138(6): 950-960, 2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34794166

RESUMO

SUMMARY: With an estimated 3.8 million breast cancer survivors in the United States, obstetrician-gynecologists often are on the front lines of addressing survivorship issues, including the hypoestrogenic-related adverse effects of cancer therapies or early menopause in survivors (1). Although systemic and vaginal estrogen are used widely for symptomatic relief of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in the general population, among individuals with a history of hormone-sensitive cancer, there is uncertainty about the safety of hormone-based therapy, leading many individuals with bothersome symptoms to remain untreated, with potential negative consequences on quality of life (2). An effective management strategy requires familiarity with a range of both hormonal and nonhormonal treatment options, knowledge about the pharmaceutical mechanisms of action, and the ability to tailor treatment based on individual risk factors. This clinical consensus document was developed using an a priori protocol in conjunction with two authors specializing in urogynecology and gynecologic oncology. This document has been updated to review the safety and efficacy of newer hormonal treatment options as well as nonhormonal modalities.


Assuntos
Estrogênios/administração & dosagem , Doenças Urogenitais Femininas/tratamento farmacológico , Ginecologia/normas , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/normas , Urologia/normas , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Consenso , Estrogênios/metabolismo , Feminino , Doenças Urogenitais Femininas/etiologia , Doenças Urogenitais Femininas/metabolismo , Humanos , Menopausa Precoce/metabolismo
9.
J Urol ; 206(6): 1469-1479, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34470508

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We examined changes in urological care delivery due to COVID-19 in the U.S. based on patient, practice, and local/regional demographic and pandemic response features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed real-world data from the American Urological Association Quality (AQUA) Registry collected from electronic health record systems. Data represented 157 outpatient urological practices and 3,165 providers across 48 U.S. states and territories, including 3,297,721 unique patients, 12,488,831 total outpatient visits and 2,194,456 procedures. The primary outcome measure was the number of outpatient visits and procedures performed (inpatient or outpatient) per practice per week, measured from January 2019 to February 2021. RESULTS: We found large (>50%) declines in outpatient visits from March 2020 to April 2020 across patient demographic groups and states, regardless of timing of state stay-at-home orders. Nonurgent outpatient visits decreased more across various nonurgent procedures (49%-59%) than for procedures performed for potentially urgent diagnoses (38%-52%); surgical procedures for nonurgent conditions also decreased more (43%-79%) than those for potentially urgent conditions (43%-53%). African American patients had similar decreases in outpatient visits compared with Asians and Caucasians, but also slower recoveries back to baseline. Medicare-insured patients had the steepest declines (55%), while those on Medicaid and government insurance had the lowest percentage of recovery to baseline (73% and 69%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides real-world evidence on the decline in urological care across demographic groups and practice settings, and demonstrates a differential impact on the utilization of urological health services by demographics and procedure type.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Doenças Urológicas/terapia , Urologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/normas , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Telemedicina/normas , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/tendências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/tendências , Urologia/normas , Urologia/tendências , Adulto Jovem
10.
Eur Urol ; 80(5): 603-620, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34511305

RESUMO

CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) has updated its guidelines on sexual and reproductive health for 2021. OBJECTIVE: To present a summary of the 2021 version of the EAU guidelines on sexual and reproductive health, including advances and areas of controversy in male infertility. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The panel performed a comprehensive literature review of novel data up to January 2021. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was included that was based either on a systematic review of the literature or consensus opinion from the expert panel, where applicable. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The male partner in infertile couples should undergo a comprehensive urological assessment to identify and treat any modifiable risk factors causing fertility impairment. Infertile men are at a higher risk of harbouring and developing other diseases including malignancy and cardiovascular disease and should be screened for potential modifiable risk factors, such as hypogonadism. Sperm DNA fragmentation testing has emerged as a novel biomarker that can identify infertile men and provide information on the outcomes from assisted reproductive techniques. The role of hormone stimulation therapy in hypergonadotropic hypogonadal or eugonadal patients is controversial and is not recommended outside of clinical trials. Furthermore, there is insufficient evidence to support the widespread use of other empirical treatments and surgical interventions in clinical practice (such as antioxidants and surgical sperm retrieval in men without azoospermia). There is low-quality evidence to support the routine use of testicular fine-needle mapping as an alternative diagnostic and predictive tool before testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), and either conventional or microdissection TESE remains the surgical modality of choice for men with NOA. CONCLUSIONS: All infertile men should undergo a comprehensive urological assessment to identify and treat any modifiable risk factors. Increasing data indicate that infertile men are at higher risk of cardiovascular mortality and of developing cancers and should be screened and counselled accordingly. There is low-quality evidence supporting the use of empirical treatments and interventions currently used in clinical practice; the efficacy of these therapies needs to be validated in large-scale randomised controlled trials. PATIENT SUMMARY: Approximately 50% of infertility will be due to problems with the male partner. Therefore, all infertile men should be assessed by a specialist with the expertise to not only help optimise their fertility but also because they are at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease and cancer long term and therefore require appropriate counselling and management. There are many treatments and interventions for male infertility that have not been validated in high-quality studies and caution should be applied to their use in routine clinical practice.


Assuntos
Guias como Assunto , Infertilidade Masculina , Saúde Reprodutiva , Saúde Sexual , Urologia/normas , Azoospermia , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/diagnóstico , Infertilidade Masculina/terapia , Masculino , Sociedades Médicas , Recuperação Espermática
11.
J Urol ; 206(5): 1114-1121, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34495686

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Priapism is a persistent penile erection that continues hours beyond, or is unrelated to, sexual stimulation and results in a prolonged and uncontrolled erection. Given its time-dependent and progressive nature, priapism is a situation that both urologists and emergency medicine practitioners must be familiar with and comfortable managing. Acute ischemic priapism, characterized by little or no cavernous blood flow and abnormal cavernous blood gases (ie, hypoxic, hypercarbic, acidotic) represents a medical emergency and may lead to cavernosal fibrosis and subsequent erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed by Emergency Care Research Institute for articles published between January 1, 1960 and May 1, 2020. Searches identified 2948 potentially relevant articles, and 2516 of these were excluded at the title or abstract level for not meeting inclusion criteria for any key question. Full texts for the remaining 432 articles were reviewed, and ultimately 137 unique articles were included in the report. RESULTS: This Guideline was developed to inform clinicians on the proper diagnosis and surgical and non-surgical treatment of patients with acute ischemic priapism. This Guideline addresses the role of imaging, adjunctive laboratory testing, early involvement of urologists when presenting to the emergency room, discussion of conservative therapies, enhanced data for patient counseling on risks of erectile dysfunction and surgical complications, specific recommendations on intracavernosal phenylephrine with or without irrigation, the inclusion of novel surgical techniques (eg, tunneling), and early penile prosthesis placement. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with priapism should be evaluated emergently to identify the sub-type of priapism (acute ischemic versus non-ischemic) and those with an acute ischemic event should be provided early intervention. Treatment of the acute ischemic patient must be based on patient objectives, available resources, and clinician experience. As such, a single pathway for managing the condition is oversimplified and no longer appropriate. Using a diversified approach, some men may be treated with intracavernosal injections of phenylephrine alone, others with aspiration/irrigation or distal shunting, and some may undergo non-emergent placement of a penile prosthesis.


Assuntos
Tratamento de Emergência/normas , Disfunção Erétil/prevenção & controle , Isquemia/terapia , Priapismo/terapia , Urologia/normas , Doença Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/normas , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Disfunção Erétil/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Isquemia/etiologia , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Masculino , América do Norte , Ereção Peniana/fisiologia , Pênis/diagnóstico por imagem , Pênis/efeitos dos fármacos , Pênis/fisiopatologia , Pênis/cirurgia , Fenilefrina/administração & dosagem , Priapismo/diagnóstico , Priapismo/etiologia , Priapismo/fisiopatologia , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Fatores de Tempo , Ultrassonografia Doppler , Urologia/métodos
12.
J Urol ; 206(5): 1106-1113, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34495688

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The clinician treating patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) needs to balance a variety of factors when making treatment decisions. In addition to the patient's urologic symptoms and urodynamic findings, other issues that may influence management options of the lower urinary tract include cognition, hand function, type of neurologic disease, mobility, bowel function/management, and social and caregiver support. This Guideline allows the clinician to understand the options available to treat patients, understand the findings that can be seen in NLUTD, and appreciate which options are best for each individual patient. This allows for decisions to be made with the patient, in a shared decision-making manner, such that the patient's quality of life can be optimized with respect to their bladder management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search for studies assessing patients undergoing evaluation, surveillance, management, or follow-up for NLUTD was conducted from January 2001 through October 2017 and was rerun in February 2021 to capture newer literature. The primary search returned 20,496 unique citations. Following a title and abstract screen, full texts were obtained for 3,036 studies. During full-text review, studies were primarily excluded for not meeting the PICO criteria. One hundred eight-four primary literature studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the evidence base. RESULTS: This guideline was developed to inform clinicians on the proper evaluation, diagnosis, and risk stratification of adult patients with NLUTD and the non-surgical and surgical treatment options available. Additional statements on urinary tract infection and autonomic dysreflexia were developed to guide the clinician. CONCLUSIONS: NLUTD patients may undergo non-surgical and surgical treatment options depending on their level of risk, symptoms, and urodynamic findings. Appropriate follow-up, primarily based on their risk stratification, must be maintained after treatment.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/terapia , Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica/terapia , Urologia/normas , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/normas , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Terapia por Exercício/normas , Humanos , Cateterismo Uretral Intermitente/métodos , Cateterismo Uretral Intermitente/normas , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados Unidos , Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica/complicações , Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica/diagnóstico , Urodinâmica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/normas , Urologia/métodos
13.
J Urol ; 206(5): 1097-1105, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34495687

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The clinician treating patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) needs to balance a variety of factors when making treatment decisions. In addition to the patient's urologic symptoms and urodynamic findings, other issues that may influence management options of the lower urinary tract include cognition, hand function, type of neurologic disease, mobility, bowel function/management, and social and caregiver support. This Guideline allows the clinician to understand the options available to treat patients, understand the findings that can be seen in NLUTD, and appreciate which options are best for each individual patient. This allows for decisions to be made with the patient, in a shared decision-making manner, such that the patient's quality of life can be optimized with respect to their bladder management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search for studies assessing patients undergoing evaluation, surveillance, management, or follow-up for NLUTD was conducted from January 2001 through October 2017 and was rerun in February 2021 to capture newer literature. The primary search returned 20,496 unique citations. Following a title and abstract screen, full texts were obtained for 3,036 studies. During full-text review, studies were primarily excluded for not meeting the PICO criteria. One hundred eight-four primary literature studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the evidence base. RESULTS: This guideline was developed to inform clinicians on the proper evaluation, diagnosis, and risk stratification of patients with NLUTD and the non-surgical and surgical treatment options available. Additional statements on urinary tract infection and autonomic dysreflexia were developed to guide the clinician. This Guideline is for adult patients with NLUTD and pediatric NLUTD will not be discussed. CONCLUSIONS: NLUTD patients should be risk-stratified as either low-, moderate-, high-, or unknown-risk. After diagnosis and stratification, patients should be monitored according to their level of risk at regular intervals. Patients who experience new or worsening signs and symptoms should be reevaluated and risk stratification should be repeated.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica/diagnóstico , Urologia/normas , Adulto , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados Unidos , Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica/complicações , Urodinâmica , Urologia/métodos
14.
Investig Clin Urol ; 62(6): 658-665, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34387041

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the relevance of training and experience to gaining expertise in prostate biopsy based on an assessment of outcomes from the performance of urology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 10,299 patients who underwent prostate biopsy by 50 operators under a unified urology residency program. The number of prostate biopsies performed by an operator for each patient was used as an indicator of operator experience. Residents were grouped into quartiles according to cancer detection rates in the first 50 and the last 50 procedures. RESULTS: Among 10,299 patients (median age, 67.5 years; median prostate-specific antigen [PSA], 7.04 ng/mL), the overall prostate cancer detection rate and that for patients with PSA <10.0 ng/mL were 37.0% and 25.9%, respectively. Operator experience was a significant predictor for cancer detection in patients with PSA <10.0 ng/mL. Cancer detection rates and the proportion of more advanced prostate cancers were higher in the last 50 cases than in the first 50 cases. Detection rates varied significantly among operator; residents with higher detection rates at training initiation showed even higher detection rates after additional training. CONCLUSIONS: Training that adds to the cumulative experience of a trainee appears to play a meaningful role in improving cancer detection rates. The level of skill required to achieve mastery for independent practice may be assessed from the accuracy results of prostate biopsy procedures, and trainees with poor rates will require more technical training to improve precision.


Assuntos
Biópsia , Competência Clínica/normas , Educação , Internato e Residência/métodos , Próstata/patologia , Urologia , Biópsia/métodos , Biópsia/normas , Educação/métodos , Educação/normas , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Masculino , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Urologia/educação , Urologia/métodos , Urologia/normas
16.
J Urol ; 206(4): 818-826, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34384236

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Surgical therapies for symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are many, and vary from minimally invasive office based to high-cost operative approaches. This Guideline presents effective evidence-based surgical management of male lower urinary tract symptoms secondary/attributed to BPH (LUTS/BPH). See accompanying algorithm for a detailed summary of procedures (figure[Figure: see text]). MATERIALS/METHODS: The Minnesota Evidence Review Team searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and AHRQ databases to identify eligible studies published between January 2007 and September 2020, which includes the initial publication (2018) and amendments (2019, 2020). The Team also reviewed articles identified by Guideline Panel Members. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table[Table: see text]). RESULTS: Twenty-four guideline statements pertinent to pre-operative and surgical management were developed. Appropriate levels of evidence and supporting text were created to direct urologic providers towards suitable and safe operative interventions for individual patient characteristics. A re-treatment section was created to direct attention to longevity and outcomes with individual approaches to help guide patient counselling and therapeutic decisions. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative and surgical management of BPH requires attention to individual patient characteristics and procedural risk. Clinicians should adhere to recommendations and familiarize themselves with criteria that yields the highest likelihood of surgical success when choosing a particular approach for a particular patient.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/cirurgia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Prostatectomia/normas , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Disfunção Erétil/diagnóstico , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/urina , Masculino , Tamanho do Órgão , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Hiperplasia Prostática/patologia , Medição de Risco/normas , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Urologia/métodos , Urologia/normas
17.
J Urol ; 206(4): 806-817, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34384237

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a histologic diagnosis describing proliferation of smooth muscle and epithelial cells within the prostatic transition zone. The prevalence and severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men are progressive and impact the health and welfare of society. This revised Guideline provides a useful reference on effective evidence-based management of male LUTS/BPH. See the accompanying algorithm for a summary of the procedures detailed in the Guideline (figures 1 and 2[Figure: see text][Figure: see text]). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Minnesota Evidence Review Team searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and AHRQ databases to identify eligible English language studies published between January 2008 and April 2019, then updated through December 2020. Search terms included Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords for pharmacological therapies, drug classes, and terms related to LUTS or BPH. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate), or C (low) for support of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendations. In the absence of sufficient evidence, information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions (table 1[Table: see text]). RESULTS: Nineteen guideline statements pertinent to evaluation, work-up, and medical management were developed. Appropriate levels of evidence and supporting text were created to direct both primary care and urologic providers towards streamlined and suitable practices. CONCLUSIONS: The work up and medical management of BPH requires attention to individual patient characteristics, while also respecting common principles. Clinicians should adhere to recommendations and familiarize themselves with standards of BPH management.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnóstico , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Urologia/normas , Suplementos Nutricionais , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/terapia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/urina , Masculino , Próstata/patologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/patologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados Unidos , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico , Urologia/métodos
19.
Urol Oncol ; 39(10): 735.e1-735.e8, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34103225

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) in urologic oncology are the basis of patient management. Considerable debate exists on the limitation of statistical reporting of randomized controlled trials. Fragility index (FI) is a measure of the number of events upon which the trials statistical results depend on. The FI is defined as the minimum number of patients whose status would have to change from a 'non-event' to 'event', in order to turn a statistically significant result to a non-significant result and vice versa. Our aim is to examine the FI of RCT's in urologic oncology published in the urology literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We exhaustively searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1, 2016 to December 31 2019 for RCT's in urology journals. Only studies reporting dichotomous outcomes were included and FI was calculated for each outcome. The distributions of FI across different journals and types of outcome (primary/ secondary, significant/ non-significant) were assessed. We examined the correlation of FI with sample size and P-value. RESULTS: We identified 216 RCT's, 79 were eligible for analysis. Median FI was 3.0 (2.5, 6.0). One hundred and forty-six (89.6%) outcomes from 72 (94.7%) RCT's had a FI lower than 10 and 6 (3.7%) outcomes from 6 (7.9%) RCT's had a FI = 0. There was no statistically significant difference in FI between different types of outcomes. There was a modest correlation between the FI and the sample size (rs 0.50, P < 0.01) and a weak correlation between the FI the P value (rs 0.15 (P < 0.04)). CONCLUSIONS: Randomized controlled trials in urology journals that study dichotomous outcomes often report fragile results that should be regarded with caution. Reporting the FI alongside P values may enhance the interpretation and implementation of urologic oncology RCT's.


Assuntos
Urologia/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
20.
Eur Urol ; 80(5): 592-600, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34020827

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Live surgery events (LSEs) have been used in all surgical fields for education and training and to demonstrate new techniques. The European Association of Urology (EAU) live surgery guidelines were established in 2014. OBJECTIVE: To review the compliance of outcomes for procedures performed at EAU-affiliated LSEs with the 2014 guidelines and to establish updated guidelines for LSEs and semi-LSEs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Patients from EAU-affiliated LSEs were included for all surgical procedures carried out between January 2015 and January 2020. All these events were pre-evaluated by the EAU Live Surgery Committee and met the criteria for an EAU LSE, with outcomes recorded and submitted to the registry. Data were collected for the type of procedure and for intraoperative and short- and long-term complications. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 246 procedures were performed across 18 LSEs, with an annual volume ranging from 19 to 74 procedures. These included 109 (44.3%) robot-assisted procedures, 21 (8.5%) laparoscopic procedures, 10 (4%) transurethral bladder procedures, 11 (4.4%) prostate enucleation procedures, 72 (29.2%) endourological procedures, and 23 (9.3%) andrology or reconstruction procedures. A total of 77 different surgical techniques and variations for 55 different types of surgery were performed as LSEs over the past 5 yr. There were 44 (17.8%) short-term complications and 11.3% (nine/79) long-term complications observed, with Clavien grade III/IV complications seen in 5.2% and 7.5% of cases over short- and long-term follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-yr outcomes for EAU LSEs show that they are safe and follow previous guidelines set by the panel. It seems likely that the fine balance between patient safety and educational value might be best achieved if LSEs are performed by local surgeons in their parent hospital with patients and staff they know, and that technological advances will make live streaming a seamless process. The current EAU Live Surgery Committee has updated the guidelines on LSEs and provided new guidelines for semi-live events. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed 5-year outcomes for live surgery events endorsed by the European Association of Urology. We found that the operations carried out at these events were safe and followed the guidelines previously set. We have updated the guidelines and provided new guidelines for semi-live events.


Assuntos
Guias como Assunto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/normas , Urologia/educação , Europa (Continente) , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Sociedades Médicas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Urologia/organização & administração , Urologia/normas , Webcasts como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...